...
Lastly, if the target does not generate at all, the problem could be caused by headers. This issue is associated with the Initialization error in XTM Workbench. The solutions to this problem include reanalysis of the whole project or manual repair of the issue. More about it in this article: XTM Workbench – most common issues & troubleshooting.
What does the “not supported - without workflow” information mean in a project’s workflow?
...
For XLIFF 1.2 files, the State attribute of a target element in a trans-unit is imported as a segment state in XTM Workbench. By default, signed-off is imported as completed, but we can also prepare a different mapping configuration if other XLIFF 1.2 states (as defined in the XLIFF standard) are preferred to be set as an XTM Workbench segment state. For more details, see How XLIFF/XLF Files are Handled as Source Files in XTM Cloud.
What is more, when uploading offline XLIFF files to a project, the relevant segments will be locked in XTM Workbench if any of the following attributes is used in the trans-unit node in the XLIFF file: xtm:locked="yes", xtm:locked="true", xtm:locked="y".
...
The segment can be processed differently in different languages if it is a file with plurals (formats: Android XML, JSON with ICU syntax, PO, stringsdict (for more details, see How to configure plurals in XTM Cloud)). It is also possible that a source segment is the same but the inline tags are not grouped in one of the languages due to translation from a TM match.
...
This might be for several reasons. One reason could be that the segments did not originate from the same paragraph in the source document. In XTM Workbench, segments from the same paragraph are separated by a dotted line, and only these can be merged. Segments from different paragraphs, separated by a solid line, cannot be merged. You can find more information about this in the following article: Merging/unmerging segments in XTM Workbench.
Another reason could be that one of the segments is in read-only mode, or one of them is a file repetition. These segments cannot be merged.
...
See the article that describes the process of creating a filter template via the UI: How to create a filter template in the XTM UI and apply it to a project.
Also, make sure to visit the official XTM Group documentation, for even better comprehension of the subject: Configuring custom variables in a new template at Project level.
...
Should you need further help with setting up relevant custom variables, or with creating entire new filter templates, do not hesitate to issue a JSM ticket to the XTM International Support team (see the following article for more information: How to request a new configuration or change to an existing one).
Why is some text from JSON not getting extracted for translation in XTM Cloud?
There might be a number of reasons why some text from the JSON file is not getting extracted for translation in XTM Cloud. One of them might be specific settings of your file filter template that accounts for parsing JSON files.
For example take a look at the following two JSON lines:
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
"supposeThatHttpdHasTwoHashValues": "JA_Suppose that httpd has two hash values (h1 and h2) across 1000 servers in the farm: h1 in 1 server, h2 in the rest 999 servers. In this case, minority_score(h1) = 0.999, minority_score(h2) = 0.001. Then score(h1) = -log2(0.999) * 98 + 1 = 1.14. Since minority_score(h2) < 0.5, h2 is not considered an anomaly, hence score(h2) = 100.",
"supposeThatHttpdHasTwoHashValuesH1AndH2": "Suppose that httpd has two hash values (h1 and h2) across 10 servers in the farm: h1 in 1 server, h2 in the rest 9 servers. In this case, minority_score(h1) = 0.9, minority_score(h2) = 0.1. Then score(h1) = -log2(0.9) * 98 + 1 = 15.90. Since minority_score(h2) < 0.5, h2 is not considered an anomaly, hence score(h2) = 100.", |
Most of the value of the “supposeThatHttpdHasTwoHashValues" parameter is contained in between underscore characters, whereas the value of the "supposeThatHttpdHasTwoHashValuesH1AndH2" parameter is not. You might have a special configuration applied in your filter template which converts anything between underscore characters into an inline tag. You can then see them in the { } Inline tags section, in XTM Workbench.
...
Considering the above, make sure to first review the configuration of your filter template and do not hesitate to contact the XTM Support team in case of any doubts/questions.