...
RateCard1 – pl_PL:
Fixed prices per language: Man fee 25%, Fixed price 5, Min. charge 55;Fixed prices per Translate: Man fee 20%, Fixed price 5, Min. charge 15;
Fixed prices per Correct: Man fee 10%, Fixed price 3, Min. charge 15.
RateCard2 – de_DE:
Fixed prices per language: Man fee 50%, Fixed price 15, Min charge 40;Fixed prices per Translate: Man fee 10%, Fixed price 2, Min charge 10.
...
Costs calculation
pl_PL:
Translate:
10 * 1,2 + 5 = 17 → 17 > 15, so the final price for this step is 17.Correct:
10 * 1,1 + 3 = 14 → 14 < 15, so the final price for this step is 15.
...
20 * 1,5 + 15 = 45 → 45 > 40, so the total price for language is 45.3.
Final result
Sum for the languages: 45 + 55 = 100;
Price for the user: 100 * 1,1 + 10 = 120 → 120 > 115, so the final price for the user is 120;
Price for the project (the sum of costs for all users): 120.
...
The client created a simple project with 1 step and 1 file (a .txt file) containing 10 segments.
None of the segments received a TM match, and the linguist translated all the segments.
...
...
The project was reanalyzed. ICE matches were inserted in previously translated segments. Statistics remain unchanged.
...
At this point, there are Costs for 10 No matching segments. |
---|
...
The linguist changed the translation in each segment.
...
At this point, there are Costs for 10 ICE-matched and 10 No matching segments. |
---|
...
The client created a simple project with 1 step and 1 file (a .txt file) containing 10 segments.
As in the previous case, none of the segments received a TM match and the linguist translated all the segments.
The client made a continuous project update (modified the .txt file by adding 5 new segments, bringing the total number of segments to 15). ICE matches were inserted in previously translated segments (except for one segment in which a Leveraged match was inserted). Statistics remain unchanged.
...
...
The linguist ONLY translated new segments (11-15) and approved segment 10 (Leveraged match).
...
At this point, there are Costs for 15 No matching segments and 1 Leverage-matched segment. |
---|
...
The linguist corrected the translations of the old segments (1-10).
...
At this point, there are Costs for 9 ICE-matched segments, 1 Leverage-matched segment and 15 No matching segments. |
---|
...
At this point, there are Costs for 10 No matching segments. |
---|
...
The linguist changed the translation in each segment.
...
At this point, there are Costs for 10 ICE-matched and 10 No matching segments. |
---|
...
At this point, there are Costs for 10 No matching segments. |
---|
...
The linguist ONLY translated new segments (11-15) and approved segment 10.
...
At this point, there are Costs for 1 Leverage-matched segment and 15 No matching segments. |
---|
...
The linguist corrected the translations of the old segments (1-10).
...
At this point, there are Costs for 9 ICE-matched segments, 1 Leverage-matched segment and 15 No matching segments. |
---|